One Case, Start to Finish
Referral to sealed report on one sample case, in three minutes.
Sample case, synthetic data. No real person. Captions on; transcript below.
Transcript
This is VESPER Psychology, a desktop workspace for psychologists who write evaluations. Three minutes, one sample case, nothing here is a real person. Start with the rule the whole thing is built around. The software never diagnoses. It presents evidence against the criteria. You render, defer, or reject, every item, by hand, and you attest that the decisions are yours. We will come back to this screen. First, where a case begins. A case starts from the referral. Upload the referral letter and the intake fills from it; you correct what it got wrong. Sixteen evaluation types, from competency to custody to neuropsychological, each with its own report structure later. Records go into the case in folders you would recognise, and those folders are on your own computer, in a workspace location you chose at setup. There is no VESPER cloud for your case files. You pick the instruments and you enter the scores. It does not score answer sheets and it does not interpret for you. What it does is arithmetic: validity cutoffs checked against the values you entered, and a record of what you administered and when. Interview notes come in as transcripts, or you record in the app and the transcription runs on your machine, offline. Now the screen from the start. With the record in, the assistant lays the evidence out criterion by criterion: what supports each one, what contradicts it, onset and course. Every entry arrives as evidence presented, never as a conclusion. You decide each one. Before any text went to a model, names, dates and identifiers were replaced with single-use tokens on this machine. The report is assembled from what you confirmed, in the structure that evaluation type calls for. Sections whose stage is not finished stay blank and say so. Every section is marked draft until you have reviewed it, and names its sources. Export to Word or PDF, onto your own disk. An editor pass reviews and flags. It never edits your text. When you attest, the report locks and carries an integrity hash. That is what you hand to a court, or a colleague, with your name on it. Then you sign and publish, and the case is complete. Every action in the case is written to an audit trail where each entry is hashed with the one before it, so a change anywhere shows. Verify it in one click. You decide, you sign, and the workspace can prove nothing changed. Ten-day trial at vesperpsych.com.